Installations
Johnson Controls: Fort Bliss, Ground-Zero for Net Zero
U.S. Army photo
It’s zero hour for a massive military initiative that’s aimed at saving lives, saving resources and saving millions of taxpayer dollars. With the April 2011 announcement of the U.S. Army’s Net Zero Installation Strategy, military installations around the world are watching pilot projects, such as Fort Bliss, that are revolutionizing the way the Armed Forces – indeed, the Federal government – build, run and maintain its operations.
Net Zero installations consume only as much energy or water as they produce and eliminate solid waste to landfills, according to Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment, who is leading the Army’s effort.i The projects include five interrelated steps: reduction, re-purpose, recycling and composting, energy recovery and disposal.
“Our mission is not just to achieve the technology integration, environmental and sustainability goals for Fort Bliss, but to define the processes, procedures and lessons learned to be able to export that knowledge to the rest of the Army. This duty is up front and cutting edge – just where Fort Bliss wants to be,” says B.J. Tomlinson, renewable energy and sustainability program manager at Fort Bliss.
One of Two Net Zero
Fort Bliss is the Army’s second-largest installation in the country, located in El Paso, Texas, and on an adjacent tract of land in New Mexico. Its combined ranges and training areas encompass more than one million acres, and it provides the largest contiguous tract (1,500 sq. mi.) of virtually unrestricted airspace in the continental United States. The airspace is used for missile and artillery training and testing.ii
In April 2011, the U.S. Army named almost two dozen Army installations in its Net Zero pilot project. Fort Bliss and the Oregon Army National Guard volunteered to become Net Zero installations, and others are taking on individual sustainability elements relative to specific classifications, such as:
-
• A Net Zero ENERGY Installation produces as much energy on-site as it uses within the course of a year. Sites include Fort Detrick, Maryland; Fort Hunter Liggett, Park Reserve Forces Training Area and Sierra Army Depot, California; Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands; and West Point, New York;
• A Net Zero WATER Installation limits consumption of freshwater resources and returns water back to the same watershed so not to deplete groundwater and surface water resources of that region in quantity or quality. Sites include Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.; Camp Rilea, Oregon; Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico; Fort Riley, Kansas; Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash.; and Tobyhanna Army Depot, Penn.;
• A Net Zero WASTE Installation reduces, reuses and recovers waste streams, converting them to resource values with zero landfill. Sites include Fort Detrick, Fort Hunter Liggett, Joint Base Lewis-McChord; Ford Hood, Texas; Fort Polk, La.; U.S. Army Garrison, Grafenwoehr, Germany;
The installation is under construction as it fulfills the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure plan, which is transforming Fort Bliss from an institutional training installation into a major mounted maneuver training post. By 2012, some 90,000 soldiers and family members will reside on the post.iii
Fort Bliss was one of two installations cited at the spring announcement of the pilot project involving 18 other sites that are aiming for reduced water, energy or waste. Along with Fort Carson, Fort Bliss will be a Net Zero installation, combining all three. The installations are required to submit quarterly reports documenting their challenges and successes.
“When we were identifying installations as pilots, we wanted to ensure that we had a diverse range of installations in size, mission type and geography,” says Kristine Kingery, acting director, Army sustainability policy and Net Zero installation portfolio manager, office of the deputy assistant Secretary of the Army.
“Fort Bliss is a major power projection platform for the U.S. Army, and our ability to achieve Net Zero in energy, water and waste would serve as a road map for implementing Net Zero at other large Army installations as well as provide numerous lessons learned that would benefit other installations,” she adds.
“We have to look at all aspects of projects to achieve these goals. For example, if we look at renewable energy projects that consume a lot of water, such as solar power towers, we greatly affect our Net
Fort Bliss has an aggressive program to reduce energy and water consumption, increase energy and water efficiency, modernize infrastructure and improve development of small-scale renewable and alternative energy. Efforts and their savings include:
- • Solar thermal in the post swimming pool, which saves 32,000 CCF of natural gas per year;
- • Solar daylighting in the dining facility, five motor-pools, warehouse and gym that off-sets approximately 1,000 electric lamps at 400 watts each;
- • 100 kW Solar PV renewable in the dining facility;
- • Building envelope renovations, which include large wide-bay, single-pane windows replaced with small energy-efficient windows and exterior insulation and finish system;
- • Utility monitoring and control system in the building operations and command center, which controls HVAC in approximately 135 buildings. An additional 150 buildings should be completed by 2012; and
- • 194 buildings that have been converted to modern, efficient fixture/lamp combinations with electronic ballasts.
Systems Engineering Strategy
Fort Bliss is engaging in developing a systems engineering strategy that will include detailed performance modeling of the current infrastructure, increased metering, current consumption modeling, consumption growth projections and forecasting, and interface definitions, specifications and control.
“Understanding the system as a whole is key to sizing and phased integration of renewable energy in the most efficient and sustainable manner to meet our objectives,” says Tomlinson.iv
Certainly, getting a handle on energy use is most important because of the military’s interest in energy security – a term that means different things to different people. At the recent North American Energy Efficiency Forum, co-sponsored by the U.S. Energy Association and Johnson Controls, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said, “To me, it is fundamentally about national security. It is fundamentally about energy independence and about how our military operates.”
The Army Energy Security Implementation Strategy notes that energy security for the Army involves five areas:
- Surety – Preventing the loss of access to power and fuel sources;
- Survivability – Ensuring resilience in energy systems;
- Supply – Developing alternative and renewable energy resources on installations;
- Sufficiency – Securing adequate power for critical missions; and
- Sustainability – Promoting support for the Army’s mission, its community and the environment.v
The installation’s energy goals include:
- Advancing energy security by raising the share of renewable energy to at least 7.5 percent and increasing energy efficiency by 30 percent or more by 2015;
- Implementing projects without adversely impacting training mission and operations;
- Establishing an energy action plan integrating existing recommendations and advancing overall energy security lifecycle planning, programming and execution; and
- Developing a strategy and framework within the Army Energy Security Implementation Strategy to ensure that its action plans are linked to the Army’s Energy Security Goals.
Becoming an Innovator
Fortunately, Fort Bliss had an early start. Through a partnership since 2007 with the U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Ala., and Johnson Controls, a global diversified technology and industrial company, the Fort Bliss Directorate of Public Works has developed $18.8 million in energy projects that encompass numerous energy conservation measures.
Photo Credit: Johnson Controls
Solar thermal tracking micro-troughs provide energy equal to 190 kw for 40 tons of cooling through a York® modular chiller.
The projects include upgrades to energy efficient lighting and lighting occupancy sensors, replacing electric motors, replacing a reciprocating chiller and water heating systems, improving building envelopes by installing insulation, and upgrading utility monitoring and control systems. They also include several renewable energy measures, such as solar thermal systems for domestic hot water usage, solar cooling and a ground-mounted solar photovoltaic system. Fort Bliss also has a solar-heated swimming pool.
“By focusing on efficiency measures first we’re able to reduce the energy generation requirements necessary to accomplish Net Zero. This reduces the cost to accomplish Net Zero energy,” says John Reasoner, senior account executive, Johnson Controls.
Tomlinson says the many different areas of project development present the following challenges:
- Technology maturity and life-cycle costs associated with it are paramount in deciding what can be developed successfully and at acceptable risk at Fort Bliss;
- Finding the right path to link the Army and industry in a partnership where industry brings capital investment and know-how to the table and the Army brings land and guaranteed consumption over the long term. This partnership is delicate and long-term and has to be advantageous to both industry and the Army;
- The legal and regulatory environment for utilities is complex and has its own unique set of challenges to be met in order to implement many of the Net Zero initiatives.
“Only through cooperation and planning can we be certain to build a project that meets the needs of the Army and falls in the right place for the rules,” comments Tomlinson.
ESPC Funding
The annual cost savings from these combined water and energy improvements is expected to be nearly $2.1 million, and the simple payback on the initial investment is about nine years. Payment for the project comes from an Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC), a valuable tool available to Federal agencies as they strive to meet Federal energy reduction goals of 30 percent energy and 15 percent water reduction by 2015.
ESPCs have been a successful model for implementing energy efficiency retrofits in the public sector since the 1990s. Federal installations can use energy and operational savings over a specified time period to fund infrastructure improvements through a lease arrangement provided by a third-party financial institution. The projects are designed so that the annual energy and operational savings are greater than or equal to the required payments over the term of the contract, thus leaving a net neutral impact on a customer’s budget.
“The task of Net Zero would probably not be achievable without the use of ESPCs going hand-in-hand with the development of utility-scale renewable energy, water and waste projects,” explains Tomlinson.
Early Results
Below are highlights of the current conservation accomplishments at Fort Bliss, according to Tomlinson:
Energy Savings Performance Contracts are a valuable tool available to Federal agencies as they strive to meet Federal energy reduction goals of 30 percent energy and 15 percent water reduction by 2015. To install confidence in a project, all performance contracts contain some form of measurement and verification. By following an international standard, energy service companies develop a benchmark for a project’s savings, then compare energy use before and after the project. The options provide a range of approaches depending on the characteristics of the project, balanced with accuracy and cost.
- • Option (A) Retrofit Isolation: Key Parameter Measurement – Savings are determined by measuring some of the key performance parameters, which define the energy use of the energy conservation measure’s affected systems in relation to the success of the project. When those measurements are not available, estimates are determined with specific documentation based on historical data, manufacturer’s specifications or engineering judgment.
- • Option (B) Retrofit Isolation: All Parameter Measurement – Savings are determined by measuring all key performance parameters, which define the energy use of the specific ECM-affected system.
- • Option (C) Whole Facility – Savings are determined by measuring energy use at the whole facility or a sub-facility level.
- • Option (D) Calibrated Simulation – Savings are determined through simulation of the energy use of the whole facility or of a sub-facility.
- Energy Management Progress: Against the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 07) mandated goals, Fort Bliss has achieved a 15 percent decrease in energy consumption intensity for FY 2010, relative to a 2003 baseline;
- Water Management Progress: Pursuant to Executive Order 13514, Fort Bliss decreased its water consumption by 33 percent relative to the baseline, attributed mainly to the use of waterless urinals, low-flow faucets and shower heads for new construction and renovations;
- Metering Program: In accordance with the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and EISA 07, Fort Bliss is currently on track to meet metering goals and has installed 98 percent of the advanced meters in required facilities;
- Energy Conservation Investment Program: In FY10, Fort Bliss received $2.45M to install daylighting (e.g. solar tubes) and controls for approximately 210,000 square feet of facilities with annual cost avoidance of $196,000 and annual energy savings of 10,452 MBTU;
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): In FY 2010, Fort Bliss had a total of seven ARRA energy conservation projects with a cumulative investment of $7.5 million and projected annual savings of $100,000. Projects implemented a multitude of energy initiatives to include building envelopes, hybrid cooling, solar daylighting and occupancy sensors.vi
But that doesn’t mean Fort Bliss is resting. Plans are in the works for onsite renewable energy generation from a 140MW waste-to-energy and concentrated solar thermal plant, a 50MW public utility solar photovoltaic plant, a 40MW geothermal plant and a 50MW wind plant – all linked to a smart grid, which will monitor, control and optimize energy consumption and generation for the entire post.
“As a pilot installation, Fort Bliss also is working with the other pilot installations to share challenges and lessons learned. The Army is actively working to bring technical resources internally and externally, for example from the Department of Energy Laboratories, to help,” Kingery comments.
Tomlinson credits Army leadership, Installation Management Command, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Department of Energy and “a host of other subject matter expertise available to the Army to answer tough questions and to help us on the way to Net Zero.”
Net Zero Progress
Energy security clearly is a military issue. Indeed, more than 70 percent of convoys in Afghanistan are used to transport fuel or water. And, more than 3,000 U.S. troops and contractors have been killed or wounded protecting them because they are easy targets for insurgents’ roadside bombs, according to former Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III.vii
But the progress at Fort Bliss and other Army posts brings energy security closer to home. It will take a combined partnership with installations, state and local government, utilities, private sector companies and others to address it, but this Net Zero approach can be replicated at Federal facilities and private sector companies alike as energy, water and waste management prices rise and leaders seek solutions.
Issue No. 14, 2011
Photo Credit: Johnson Controls
Not your father’s barracks – A solar thermal array provides hot water for Fort Bliss.
References:
i “Army Identifies Net Zero Pilot Installations,” News Release, April 19, 2011 – http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=14420
ii GlobalSecurity.org – http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/fort-bliss.htm
iii Ft. Bliss website – https://www.bliss.army.mil/garrison/
iv “Net Zero Bliss,” Journal of Installation Management, Spring 2011
v Army Information Paper SAIE-EP, May 2010 – http://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/Partnerships/EnergySecurity/docs/Army_Energy_Enterprise_IP_May-10.pdf
vi “Net Zero Bliss,” Journal of Installation Management, Spring 2011
vii “Lynn: Defense-Energy Team Leads National Effort,” American Forces Press Service, April 26, 2011 – http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63699